Learn
Train leadership or staff
Independently quoted training
Briefing, workshop, practical lab, build-along, or office hours. No assessment, Blueprint, pilot, or implementation purchase is required.
Review TrainingPricing and scope
Learn independently, diagnose the problem at no cost, define a wider implementation before approving it, test one bounded AI task, or build and improve controlled production workflows. Every route states what is included, what remains outside scope, and what the client owns.
Start by...
You do not need to follow every page or engagement stage. Use the entry point that matches what you already know, then move only as far as the next decision requires.
Choose the commercial route by need
The Level 0-4 structure describes increasing implementation depth. Independent training and AI Operations can be purchased without moving through every level, while consulting, pilots, and implementation use the smallest approved boundary appropriate to the current decision.
Independently quoted training
Briefing, workshop, practical lab, build-along, or office hours. No assessment, Blueprint, pilot, or implementation purchase is required.
Review TrainingFree diagnostic, scoped consulting, or $3,500 Blueprint
Use the smallest discovery boundary that can clarify the operating problem, readiness, systems, records, authority, and implementation decision.
Review Consulting$6,500-$12,500 typical pilot range
A controlled test of viability, quality, failure, cost, review burden, and the recommendation to proceed, revise, or stop.
Review the Pilot$9,500-$75,000+ planning range
One controlled workflow or a phased operating layer, quoted after scope, access, migration, integrations, controls, responsibilities, and acceptance are confirmed.
Review ImplementationScoped after diagnosis
Reliability, source authority, evaluation, monitoring, cost, permissions, review, recovery, and change-control remediation based on the existing system and evidence.
Review AI OperationsCommercial route comparison
Plain-language labels explain the purpose of each route. Formal service names, prices, exclusions, and acceptance terms remain controlling in the written agreement.
Review one route in detail
Operating-Layer Blueprint
The workflow is known, but systems, records, ownership, or implementation boundaries need formal definition.
$3,500 fixed
About 10 business days
Provider and software alternatives
These categories solve different boundaries and can work together. The comparison is buying guidance, not a ranking, certification, or claim that every provider in a category behaves the same way.
Own posted accounting, job-cost, customer, supplier, contract, billing, payment, and configured financial records.
Choose when: a supported product can become the authoritative transaction and accounting system your contractor needs.
Boundary: It may not govern every document, handoff, exception, or cross-system workflow outside its configured boundary.
Manage supported project, document, field, communication, cost, contract, or collaboration workflows inside a construction product.
Choose when: the platform's supported modules fit the required operating workflow and adoption model.
Boundary: Cross-platform records, bespoke commercial controls, and unsupported legacy or specialist systems may still require connection work.
Model, calculate, visualize, distribute, and drill into approved data and metrics.
Choose when: source ownership, identifiers, definitions, reconciliation, and commentary controls already exist or can be configured adequately.
Boundary: A dashboard does not by itself resolve source authority, workflow ownership, failed handoffs, or approval.
Coordinate formal close tasks, account reconciliation, certification, controls, consolidation, and management-pack governance.
Choose when: finance-close control is the primary requirement and the product supports the organization's accounting environment.
Boundary: Construction-specific project, estimating, document, field, change, and operational workflows may remain outside its role.
Design and deliver integrations, scripts, RPA, no-code workflows, or application automations across industries.
Choose when: the task and required systems fit the consultancy's verified delivery capability and ownership terms.
Boundary: Construction record semantics, commercial controls, evidence, and long-term operating ownership vary by provider and engagement.
Configure AI assistants, agents, retrieval, content, voice, document, or model-enabled applications.
Choose when: the requirement is primarily an AI capability with a clear context, evaluation, permission, and operating boundary.
Boundary: AI capability does not automatically establish authoritative records, deterministic workflow control, production approval, or client ownership.
Build and operate company-specific data, software, integrations, workflow, reporting, and AI using internal authority and context.
Choose when: the organization has available product ownership, domain, engineering, security, data, testing, support, and maintenance capacity.
Boundary: The real constraint may be continuing ownership and cross-functional decisions rather than initial coding capacity.
Category-level statements are general. Product edition, implementation partner, contract, configuration, internal capability, and approved operating boundary determine the actual result.
| Requirement | StructuredLayer | Packaged software | Generic automation agency | Internal development team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connect existing contractor systems | Core fit | Product-dependent | Possible | Possible |
| Define contractor-specific controls | Core fit | Configuration-dependent | Variable | Possible with domain ownership |
| Client-owned implementation | Explicit boundary | Usually product-controlled; exports and configuration rights vary | Contract-dependent | Internal by default |
| Replace the ERP | No | Sometimes, when the selected product is an ERP | Not usually applicable | Only through a separately approved replacement programme |
| Reconcile cross-system records | Designed per workflow | Product-dependent | Possible | Possible |
| Preserve approval authority | Explicit control | Product- and configuration-dependent | Variable | Must be designed internally |
| Deliver implementation evidence | Required by scope | Varies by product and partner | Varies by contract | Must be produced internally |
Use the free assessment when the category is unclear. A suitable recommendation may be product configuration, internal delivery, another provider, a StructuredLayer engagement, redesign, deferral, or no implementation.
Start Free Workflow AssessmentCompare Levels 0-4
Choose the free assessment when the starting point is unclear, a Blueprint when a wider implementation needs a formal design, a pilot when one bounded AI task needs evidence, or implementation when the production boundary is understood. The levels are not mandatory sequential purchases.
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Buy training independently
Training can be purchased before, during, after, or without an implementation engagement. The quote reflects the audience, format, duration, preparation, customization, delivery location, materials, recording, and follow-up. Software, API usage, travel, and custom build work remain separate.
Best for
One priority workflow that needs a formal implementation design
Duration
Approximately 10 business days
Working sessions
Up to three stakeholder interviews
Deliverables
Current-state map, system inventory, target design, and implementation boundary
Decision point
Approve, revise, or stop before production implementation access
The Blueprint belongs to your business. You receive the current-state map, target workflow, system and data inventory, implementation boundary, risks, responsibilities, acceptance criteria, delivery phases, and final quotation. You may approve implementation, revise the scope, defer the project, or stop after receiving it. If StructuredLayer proceeds with implementation, an agreed portion of the Blueprint fee may be credited in the implementation proposal.
See Whether a Blueprint FitsInspect before purchasing
The sample shows the depth and type of evidence a $3,500 Operating-Layer Blueprint can contain. It is illustrative, not a client case study or guarantee.
Free
Usually 15-20 minutes; detailed submissions may take up to 30 minutes
Identify workflow gaps and receive an initial readiness summary without providing deep system credentials.
Does not include stakeholder interviews, detailed architecture, custom workflow mapping, or an implementation plan.
Start Free Workflow Assessment$3,500 fixed
Approximately 10 business days
Map the current state, target architecture, data inventory, implementation boundary, and fixed implementation quote. The completed Blueprint belongs to the client.
This is paid discovery and design. The client receives the completed Blueprint whether or not implementation proceeds. It does not include production configuration, migration, integration, or automation.
Review the Operating-Layer Blueprint$6,500-$12,500
Typical duration: 2-4 weeks
Configure one bounded AI task with limited context to test viability, cost, failure rates, and human-review requirements.
No general production commitment. The pilot is a controlled test. Any continuing live operation requires a separately approved production and ownership boundary.
Review the Bounded AI Agent Pilot$9,500-$17,500
Scoped via Blueprint
Deploy one fully controlled production workflow across approximately three core systems with dashboards, training, documentation, and client-owned handover.
The final price is quoted after scope, access, migration, integration, and approval complexity are confirmed.
Review Workflow Implementation$30,000-$75,000+
Scoped via Blueprint
Deliver a phased implementation connecting two to five workflows, shared records, reporting, and bounded AI across multiple business departments.
A paid blueprint is required before the final scope, phases, responsibilities, timeline, and fixed price are agreed.
Review Operating Layer ImplementationBounded AI Agent Pilot pricing boundary
The pilot range assumes one bounded task, one named owner, a limited context package, up to two approved systems or sources, representative test cases, and controlled human review. Additional systems, browser-only environments, large document sets, sensitive information, custom interfaces, extensive migration, or production monitoring are scoped separately.
Review the Bounded AI Agent PilotAll figures in USD
Ranges are planning guidance before a written proposal. Taxes, approved travel, and third-party platform or usage charges are excluded.
Common implementation scopes
Compare the required sources, systems, controls, outputs, and ownership before deciding whether the work belongs in a bounded pilot, Single Workflow Implementation, or Complete Operating Layer.
Turn authorized project listings, invitations, notices, and supporting documents into structured opportunities that a team can review and qualify.
Best fit
AEC and construction teams reviewing opportunities across several approved sources.
Typical outputs
Commercial treatment
Scoped within a Single Workflow or Complete Operating Layer engagement after the Blueprint confirms sources, permissions, volume, and operating ownership.
Identify authorized project documents, extract agreed fields, distinguish revisions, and surface conflicting or incomplete information for review.
Best fit
Teams managing high volumes of drawings, specifications, reports, correspondence, or other changing project documents.
Typical outputs
Commercial treatment
Scoped after representative documents, extraction fields, variation, permissions, validation requirements, and exception handling are examined.
Replay approved representative cases through the proposed records, rules, permissions, and recovery paths before changing live operations.
Best fit
Teams that need evidence from prior work before introducing an AI-assisted or automated workflow into production.
Typical outputs
Commercial treatment
Included when required by the implementation scope. Historical testing supports a release decision but does not prove every future case will succeed.
Pricing boundary
These are representative implementation scopes, not separate fixed-price products or guarantees of continuous coverage, extraction correctness, automation performance, or future-case success. The written proposal defines the actual sources, outputs, review requirements, exclusions, ownership, price, and acceptance tests.
Which level fits?
The free assessment identifies the starting point. A Blueprint defines a wider implementation boundary, while a bounded pilot tests one contained AI task. Production work begins only under a separately approved implementation proposal.
Usually 15-20 minutes; detailed submissions may take up to 30 minutes
Approximately 10 business days
Typical duration: 2-4 weeks
Scoped via Blueprint
Scoped via Blueprint
What determines implementation timing
Client access and approvals · Number of participating systems · Historical migration · Document variation · Integration restrictions · Testing availability · Security review · Stakeholder decisions. The written proposal converts the applicable conditions into an agreed delivery plan and timeline.
Budget drivers
System restrictions, poor historical data, document variation, AI evaluation, security requirements, and compressed schedules create real design and validation effort.
Normal boundary versus complexity allowance: The implementation level describes the normal delivery boundary. Complexity allowances apply only when a system, dataset, or requirement creates work beyond that normal boundary. The written proposal identifies which allowances apply and why; none are added automatically.
This allowance covers additional implementation controls and coordination. It does not represent certification or a guarantee of regulatory compliance. Independent legal, compliance, security, or specialist review may be required and remains separately authorised.
Rush delivery is offered only when capacity, access, client decision-makers, security review, and testing availability allow the agreed controls to remain intact. Approval, validation, or governance requirements are not removed to meet a compressed date.
Payment milestones
Commercial stages match the size of the engagement and the moments when design, build, deployment, and handover can be inspected.
Blueprint
100%
Before kickoff
The fixed discovery engagement begins once scope, participants, confidentiality, and payment are confirmed.
Implementation under $20,000
50 / 30 / 20
Kickoff / build approval / handover
Payments follow delivery progress and named approval points rather than elapsed time alone.
Larger phased engagement
30 / 30 / 30 / 10
Kickoff / design / deployment / handover
Each phase has agreed deliverables, responsibilities, acceptance criteria, and approval authority.
Commercial boundaries
Dependable delivery requires more than a fee. The agreement identifies inputs, authority, dependencies, exclusions, tests, acceptance, and what happens when circumstances change.
Software subscriptions, hosting, storage, API, AI usage, vendor licences, and approved travel are paid separately by the client.
Work outside the signed scope begins only after the effect on price, timing, responsibilities, and acceptance is documented and approved.
The client provides authorised access, accurate available information, named decision-makers, and timely reviews. Hidden constraints or delayed approvals may change the plan.
A proposal states deliverables, exclusions, dependencies, test conditions, handover outputs, and the people authorised to accept the work.
The accepted implementation includes a defined period to correct defects against scope. Monitoring ownership transfers at handover, while enhancements and vendor-driven changes remain visible new work.
Review handover and closureCorrection of accepted-scope defects during the stated 30-day or 60-day period, with the agreed reporting and resolution process.
New features, changed rules, extra records, vendor changes, expanded integrations, new reports, and ongoing administration are scoped separately.
Pricing questions
The written proposal remains the controlling commercial document for a specific engagement.
View the complete FAQ